In the tasting by contrast of this month we will pour into our glasses again two wines produced with red grapes. They are varieties that, undeniably, do not enjoy the fame and notoriety of other Italian grapes, however they have been able to prove – with facts – their wine making talent through their respective wines. It must be said, as this happens and happened for many grapes, the enological history of the two protagonists of our tasting by contrast is similar, in some respects, to that of the ugly duckling. It must be noted both Ciliegiolo and Ruché – the two grapes we will pour this month in our glasses – have not enjoyed a notable reputation in the past. As this has been taught so many times in the history of modern enological, thanks to the good use of the technique in the vineyard and in the winery, no less important, a better viticultural awareness, these two grapes today are capable of giving our senses quality wines with valuable sensory characteristics.

 In particular Ruché, which owes its fame to the wines produced in Castagnole Monferrato, in the province of Asti, a success allowing it to reach the peak of the Olympus of Italian quality by receiving the Denominazione d'Origine Controllata e Garantita ranking. This interesting Piedmontese grape has in fact proved to give life to wines that are unique in their kind, having an interesting personality and character. Ciliegiolo, although it has not enjoyed an equal fame in the Italian enological quality system, after having been used for a very long time as a variety to be blended to other grapes, today has proved to be very interesting when vinified alone. In both cases, this is yet another proof of how technological progress in viticultural and wine making has allowed these and many other grapes to finally express their true potential.

 Ciliegiolo is mainly found in the territories of central Italy, in particular in Tuscany, the region from which this grape is believed to have its origin. It is, in any case, a supposition, as the origins of Ciliegiolo are not entirely clear and in the past several hypotheses have been formulated, including a Spanish origin, today completely denied. The spreading of Ciliegiolo can today be considered rather modest – and it is estimated its presence in the Italian vineyards is in continuous decline – however it has been cultivated for a long time in some Italian regions, in particular those in the central area. In addition to Tuscany, as already mentioned, Ciliegiolo is also present in Umbria, Latium, Marche, Liguria, Abruzzo and Emilia Romagna. Except in very rare cases, it should be noted in these regions Ciliegiolo is mainly used blended to other varieties.

 As already mentioned, the origins of Ciliegiolo are unclear and even the historical records are scarce and vague. In fact, it is believed the first mention relating to this grape dates back to 1600, however this mention – just like the following ones – does not allow to exactly determine whether it actually is about the Ciliegiolo we know today. Recent genetic studies have however allowed to discover a very close link between Ciliegiolo and Aglianicone – red berried variety native to Campania – as to make it believe this grape is of ancient origins although uncertain. Moreover, according to other studies Ciliegiolo is considered a progenitor variety of Sangiovese, a theory that reinforces the hypothesis it is a grape with ancient origins. Ciliegiolo is traditionally a variety used for the production of wines blended to other grapes – in particular Sangiovese – used to give both roundness and alcohol strength, as well as to enrich the aromatic profile with sensations of red fruits.

 Talking about Ruché grape means – of course – talking about Castagnole Monferrato, a town in the province of Asti that has linked its name with the wines produced with this grape. The origins of this variety are not entirely clear, however it is believed it originated from the area around Castagnole Monferrato where, undeniably, it represents the main enological glory. Even the origin of the name is not completely clear and it is supposed to come from the first vineyards cultivated near a small Benedictine church dedicated to San Rocco – San Roc in local dialect – today non existing anymore and probably built in the town of Castagnole Monforte or in the nearby Portacomaro. Another hypothesis believes the name comes from the famous rocche of the southern part of Piedmont, steep and perched hills where the generous vineyards are cultivated, thanks to the favorable exposure to the sun, thus becoming ruché in the local dialect.

 According to some, Ruché would have been introduced into these lands from Burgundy by the Cistercian monks in the twelfth century and, in this regard, it must be noted there are no evident elements which can confirm this hypothesis. In any case, many people believe Ruché is a very old variety and its spreading is almost limited to the territory of Monferrato and with a marginal presence in the province of Alessandria, here known as Moscatellina. Ruché is capable of producing wines with good personality and its enological re-evaluation has occurred in relatively recent times, in particular, after the 1980s. A work that has allowed the understanding of the enological potential of Ruché, especially used alone, a result which made it obtain the maximum ranking of the Italian quality system: Denominazione d'Origine Controllata e Garantita (Controlled and Guaranteed Denomination of Origin, DOCG).

The color of Ciliegiolo

 After having introduced the two varieties of this month, we can now start our tasting by contrast. The selection of wines of this month is relatively simple and should not be particularly difficult. In any case, we will make sure both wines are produced with the respective varieties alone and vinified in inert containers in order not to have any sensorial interference. As for the wine produced with Ciliegiolo, our choice will be in favor of the emerging and interesting production of the territory of Narni, a charming Umbrian town in province of Terni. The choice of the wine produced with the Piedmontese variety inevitably goes in favor of Ruché di Castagnole Monferrato, territory from which come the most interesting bottles produced with this grape. The two wines belong to the most recent vintage and are poured into their respective tasting glasses at a temperature of 17 °C. (63 °F)

 We pour now the two wines in their respective glasses and start the tasting by contrast of this month from the examination of appearance, that is how the wines show themselves in their aspect. The first wine we will examine is Ciliegiolo di Narni, therefore, by tilting the glass over a white surface, we observe the color at the base. Ciliegiolo reveals an intense and brilliant ruby red color, with moderate transparency: the object placed in contrast between the glass and the white surface is not perfectly visible. Nuances of Ciliegiolo – observed at the edge of the wine, near the opening of the glass – reveals a ruby red color, often tending to purple. Let's now pass to the evaluation of the appearance of Ruché di Castagnole Monferrato, by observing the color at the base of the glass. Also in this case we can easily see an intense and brilliant ruby red color. Just like the previous wine, transparency of Ruché too can be defined as moderate. Nuances of the Piedmontese wine – observed at the edge, where the wine becomes thinner – reveals a ruby red color.

 The olfactory profiles of Ciliegiolo and Ruché denote differences since the opening phase, that is the first sensations perceived in the nose. In both wines are smelled aromas of fruits and flowers, sometimes having the same character, however the complete development of aromas reveals substantial differences. In Ciliegiolo, in fact, we can clearly perceive aromas related to fruits and flowers, while in Ruché – in addition to these aromas – it is also possible to perceive sensations recalling spices. The olfactory evaluation of Ciliegiolo gives the nose aromas of cherry, raspberry, strawberry and plum. As for floral aromas, in Ciliegiolo we generally perceive rose, cyclamen and iris. Not so different – as for aromas recalling fruits – the profile of Ruché. To the nose reveals aromas of black cherry, plum, raspberry, blueberry and strawberry, while for aromas of flowers, in Ruché can be perceived sensations of rose and violet. In the Piedmontese grape you can also smell aromas reminiscent of spices, in particular, white pepper and nutmeg.

 Let's now evaluate the olfactory profiles of the two wines of our tasting by contrast, starting – just like we did in appearance analysis – from Ciliegiolo di Narni. Holding the glass in vertical position and without swirling, do the first smell in order to evaluate the opening of the wine, that is the initial aromas developing from the glass. To the nose are perceived, clean and intense, aromas of cherry, raspberry and strawberry, as well as a floral scent in which can be recognized cyclamen. Let's now swirl the glass, an operation favoring the development of the other aromas and proceed with another smell. The profile of Ciliegiolo is completed with plum, blueberry and rose. Let's now pass to the evaluation of the aromas of Ruché di Castagnole Monferrato: proceed with the first smell – keeping the glass still and in a vertical position – and assess the opening of the wine. To the nose can be perceived aromas of black cherry, plum and strawberry, followed by a floral scent of rose. After having swirled the glass, the profile of Ruché is completed with raspberry, blueberry and violet as well as spicy hints in which we can be perceived the aroma of white pepper.

 Let's now pass to the evaluation of the gustatory profiles of Ciliegiolo and Ruché, starting, just like the previous phases, from the Umbrian wine produced in Narni. We begin with the evaluation of the attack, that is, the main gustatory sensations the wines give the mouth at the first sip. The initial organoleptic qualities of Ciliegiolo are expressed with a moderate pseudo-burning perception produced by alcohol as well as a pleasant roundness which tends to attenuate crispness, a characteristic that in wines produced with this grape is however modest. We perceive the flavors of cherry, raspberry and strawberry, confirming the good correspondence to the nose. The structure of Ciliegiolo is moderate as well as its astringency. Let's now pass to the evaluation of Ruché di Castagnole di Monferrato's attack and take a sip of this wine. In the mouth can be perceived a good structure and pleasant roundness, with a pseudo-burning sensation produced by alcohol. Crispness and astringency are slightly stronger than in Ciliegiolo. In the mouth we perceive flavors of black cherry, plum, raspberry and strawberry, sometimes followed by a spicy touch reminiscent of white pepper.

 The final phase of the tasting is related to the sensations the wines leave in the mouth after swallowing. The finish of Ciliegiolo di Narni is characterized by a good taste-olfactory persistence in which the pleasant sensation of roundness continues to be perceived, confirming – also in this phase – the modest acidity of this grape. It can also be perceived flavors of cherry, raspberry and strawberry, followed by a sensation of moderate structure. The finish of Ruché di Castagnole Monferrato is of good taste-olfactory persistence, leaving in the mouth a sensation of perceptible roundness and, compared to Ciliegiolo, a more intense sensation of astringency and structure. In the mouth are perceived flavors of black cherry, raspberry, plum and strawberry, in addition to the pleasing spicy sensation in which can be recognized white pepper. Finally, we perform a last gustatory evaluation of the two wines, taking a sip of Ciliegiolo and then of Ruché: the differences produced in the mouth by the two wines are evident, in particular acidity and astringency.