In the past few weeks in Italy there have been rumors about the possibility of
producing alcohol-free wine or dealcoholized wine, that is a wine to which has
been removed part of its alcohol. This hypothesis, supported by France and Spain
in the European Union Institutions, has been cause in Italy of a long and
probably useless number of debates as to be seen as a new menace for wine. Many
support this initiative and say it would be useful to limit the bad and
preoccupying effects of alcohol and of its dependence, in particular the tragic
consequences of the actions of those deplorable subjects having the habit of
drinking too much before driving a vehicle. There is no doubt every
initiative taken in favor of the prevention of such grave and risky actions for
the health and safety of people must be supported and spread. We are however
convinced the most effective solution is a better culture and education,
something which is frequently forgotten by Institutions - maybe because they are
incapable or lazy - and they just believe forbidding is the best thing to do,
hopefully relying in a miracle.
Moreover, some support the production of alcohol-free wine as a sign of freedom
of choice, a new chance offered to consumers which could also bring to the
creation of a new market. No objection about this. In case there are consumers
who prefer the consumption of alcohol-free wine, why should this possibility be
denied to them? It is not just a matter of being moralists, it is likely
a wine like this would be appreciated to those who, for reasons of personal
ethics or health, cannot drink alcoholic beverages. In this sense, there is
nothing negative in the possibility of offering choices: it is a sign of
civility and freedom. Moreover, it is a new chance for producers who could
increase their profits. In case one prefers drinking an alcohol-free wine, he or
she should have the freedom to do that, likewise the same freedom must be
granted to consumers who prefer drinking and choosing a wine made in a
traditional way, that is, with alcohol.
By considering that, we don't understand what is the problem. Many believe this
initiative could represent a new attack against Italian wine, a clear attempt of
adulteration by law. Indeed, no one is forbidding Italy - or any other country -
to make wine the way it has always been made since thousands years, they are
simply thinking about the possibility of creating a new beverage which could
meet the favor of some consumers. Moreover, in case it is true adulteration is
considered as a very important matter, why don't they support the initiative of
making wine completely transparent to the eyes of consumers, by stating
in labels the list of all the ingredients and chemical additives used in the
process of production? Undoubtedly, wine is the result of a chemical process,
even in case it is made with the most strict and scrupulous natural
methods. Of course, not all of the chemical phenomena are the same and not all
are spontaneous or natural.
There are many and famous cases of adulterated products and they did no
altered or menaced the dignity and the image of the real ones. Let's
consider, for example, coffee, tea and beer. Since many years are being produced
coffee and tea with no caffeine, as well as alcohol-free beer, nevertheless the
marketing of these products has not significantly decreased. In case one wishes
to have a decaffeinated coffee, despite this choice would not be agreed by a
purist, why should we be scandalized by this choice? Not to mention beer.
Despite many alcohol-free beers have been introduced to the market, the
consumption of the beverage of Ceres is recently increased, almost reaching the
consumption of wine. The taste of decaffeinated coffee is not the same of the
regular coffee, as well as the taste of alcohol-free beer is not the same
of traditional beer: they are in fact similar products and however
different.
In case there is a problem, we believe it is represented by the concrete risk of
confusion. In particular, the confusion which would be arisen in case
dealcoholized wine is commercialized with the name of wine. Wine must be
wine: in case one consciously choose to have wine, this must be and represen
everything wine represents since thousands years, including alcohol. Because if
it is true it is right to give the freedom of choice to have an alcohol-free
wine, likewise must be given the freedom of choice to have a wine with alcohol.
This new product must not and cannot be called wine. If they want to create a
beverage derived from wine, by using an industrial process capable of removing
or reducing the alcohol produced from the fermentation of must, this cannot be
called wine. Most of all in case they support the production of this beverage as
a solution to limit the effects of alcohol: in order to avoid any confusion, i
cannot and must not be called wine. Do you want to make an alcohol-free
beverage derived from wine? There is no problem in this, but don't call it wine!
If we consider sensorial and organoleptic aspects, it is commonly known, as well
as evident, alcohol plays a fundamental role both in the balance of wine and in
the gustatory and tactile perception. An alcohol-free wine would inevitably have
a different taste and aroma from real wine, therefore it is a different produc
and it must be treated and considered as different. Let's make things clear: we
are not trying to support alcohol and its consumption, even less, its abuse. The
deplorable consumption of alcoholic beverages - including wine - cannot be
approved or supported: we have been always convinced the best appreciation of
wine is favored by moderation. And we are also against speculations, in
particular in case they are evidently adopted to confound or presume upon
consumers. Even worse, in case they are used to make deplorable commercial
profits. Make your alcohol-free beverage derived from wine, but let wine to
always be and remain wine - with all of its alcohol, tradition and culture -
because this is the way we appreciate it and want to appreciate it. With
moderation, always.
|