Most of the times the comparison of extremely distant wines, not only in terms of organoleptic qualities, but above all in geographical terms, gives extraordinary surprises for the knowledge of the nectar of Bacchus. The characteristics given by the environment in which the vine is grown up and, not less important, the enological culture of the producers, can substantially change a wine, even in case it is produced with the very same grapes. This is not the case of this month's tasting by contrast, in fact we will not compare wines made with the same grapes and produced in different places, indeed, the two varieties subject of our study do not have anything in common. Likewise, their origin is different as well as and the wines of our tasting by contrast are produced in Friuli Venezia Giulia and in California. In our glasses we will in fact pour Schioppettino, interesting variety of Friuli Venezia Giulia, and Zinfandel, the glory of California, and where it is now considered an autochthonous grape.

 Two very different climates clearly influencing the wines produced in their respective territories. This aspect can be particularly evident in Zinfandel – this is the name by which Primitivo grape is known in the United States of America – when compared to the Apulian production. A comparison which cannot be made with Schioppettino as this variety is practically found in Friuli Venezia Giulia and Slovenia only. Varieties having quite opposite characters, both grapes show in any case a good wine making versatility, giving proof of appreciable wines both in inert and in wooden containers. From an organoleptic point of view, Schioppettino and Zinfandel give decidedly opposite sensations: appreciable crispness in the variety from Friuli, roundness in the Californian one. The structure of wines produced with these varieties are significant as well: body of medium structure in Schioppettino, a structure that can even become robust in case of Zinfandel.

 The story of Schioppettino – also known as Ribolla Nera or, in Slovenia, as Pokalza – is very singular and, in some ways, even surreal. It should be noticed that in 1976, Schioppettino underwent the same fate of Pignolo and Tazzelenghe grapes when they were all declared outlaw, thus prohibiting the planting of new vineyards. This measure was fortunately revised thanks to the stubbornness of the inhabitants of Prepotto – village in the province of Udine and which is believed to be the place of origin of Schioppettino – as they strongly opposed this decision. In particular, the legal rehabilitation was supported by the strong determination of Paolo and Dina Rapuzzi, owners of Ronchi di Cialla winery. The Rapuzzi family was also involved to the identification of the “survival” vines, thus contributing a valuable work for recovery and selection which was essential for the replanting and revaluation of Schioppettino.

 Schioppettino, of course, has a much longer history than the events happened in the 1970s. There are in fact written documents about this red berried variety since 1282, in particular those found in the archives of the Castle of Albana, located in the municipality of Prepotto. It is believed Schioppettino originates from the Prepotto area, in the province of Udine, and the variety is practically found only in the Cialla area and in the neighboring territories of Slovenia. Schioppettino has been seriously threatened as to disappear from vineyards, not only for the legal events which prohibited its planting, but, before this, for the well known events related to the effects of powdery mildew and phylloxera. Moreover, also for the success of other varieties – in particular international – which were introduced in the Friulian territory, an event Schioppettino shared with many other indigenous Italian varieties. Wines produced with Schioppettino have a remarkable personality, both for the intense and clean aromas of red and black fruits, as well as for the appreciable acidity combined to a moderate astringency.

 Zinfandel is the name by which Primitivo is known in California, the famous red berried variety typical of Apulia and, in particular, of the territory of Manduria. In any case, it must be said Primitivo is the name by which the variety Crljenak Kaštelanski, originating from Dalmatia in Croatia, is known in Apulia. The most supported hypothesis wants Zinfandel specimens were sent to California from a nursery in Vienna, where varieties from Croatia were also cultivated and, among these, of course Crljenak Kaštelanski. However, the origin of the name is disputed: among the various hypotheses, the most common one wants Zinfandel deriving from Hungarian tzinifándli, which, in turn, derived from German zierfandler, a white cross between Roter Veltliner and Traminer, typical of the territory of Thermenregion in Austria. The fact the name comes from a white berried variety, suggests this was a gross mistake or they wanted Zinfandel to be considered as the red berried grape equivalent of zierfandler.

 Zinfandel is a variety of primary importance for the enology of States United States of America and, in particular, of California. This variety – for a long time considered as indigenous to California – enjoyed a moderate success, mainly in the United States of America, through the so-called blush wines, a term with which in this country are called certain rose wines. In this category of wines, often having a sweet taste or however tending to sweet, Zinfandel has certainly been the variety mainly used for their production. Today, in California, Zinfandel is mainly used for the production of red wines, usually having a remarkable structure, frequently fermented and aged in cask, especially the barrique. Wines produced with Zinfandel – exactly like those produced with Primitivo in Apulia – are also characterized by a pleasant roundness and an olfactory profile that is mainly expressed with black pulped fruits.

	The color of Napa Valley Zinfandel

 The wines we will choose for this month's tasting by contrast, besides being produced with two very different varieties, have wine making characteristics directly influencing their organoleptic qualities. The two wines, in fact, will be aged in barrique, a characteristic certainly requiring a greater effort during the sensorial analysis as this directly influences the characteristics of the wines. The reason is essentially due to Zinfandel, which – in California – is in most of the cases produced by fermenting and aging it in barrique. As for Schioppettino, our choice is in favor of a wine produced in Colli Orientali del Friuli denomination, aged – of course – in barrique. The Friulian wine is compared to a Zinfandel produced in California – possibly in the AVA (American Viticultural Area) Napa Valley – and, of course, aged in barrique. The two wines belong to relatively recent vintages – not more than three years – and served in tasting glasses at a temperature of 18 °C (65 °F).

 Let's pour the two wines into their respective glasses and start our tasting by contrast from the evaluation of the appearance of Colli Orientali del Friuli Schioppettino. Let's tilt the glass over a white surface – a white sheet of paper is enough – and observe the color and transparency at the base of the glass. The color of the Schioppettino is intense and brilliant ruby red, with a moderate transparency. Let's evaluate nuances, observed near the opening of the glass, where the thickness of the wine becomes thin: also in this case we will notice a clean ruby red color. Let's proceed to the evaluation of the color of Napa Valley Zinfandel. The color – observed at the base of the glass – is intense ruby red and, compared to the Schioppettino, the transparency is lower. Nuance of Zinfandel, observed towards the opening of the glass, confirms a ruby red color. Let's now put the two glasses tilted over the white surface in order to evaluate them together: the differences in color and transparency are evident.

 The olfactory profiles of Schioppettino and Zinfandel are very different, even distant. In wines produced with the variety from Friuli it is the sensations of fruit with a red pulp to be mainly appreciated in the glass, while in Zinfandel will mainly be black fruits with dark pulp. In both cases we will also perceive sensations reminiscent of flowers, in particular violet. In wines produced with Schioppettino will mainly be appreciated scents of cherry, raspberry, strawberry and blueberry, occasionally blackberries and currants. In some cases can also be perceived herbaceous aromas, such as pepper and black pepper. From the glass of Zinfandel will be mainly perceived aromas reminiscent of blackberry, black cherry, plum and blueberry, sometimes raspberry and strawberry as well. In some cases, Zinfandel may also express aromas reminiscent of aromatic herbs, including thyme and rosemary.

 Let's resume our tasting by contrast and evaluate the olfactory profile of Colli Orientali del Friuli Schioppettino. Holding the glass in vertical position and without swirling, proceed with the first smell in order to appreciate the opening of the wine. From the glass of Schioppettino we can perceive intense and clean aromas of cherry, raspberry and plum, as well as a pleasant scent of violet. Let's swirl the glass in order to favor the development of the other aromas and proceed with the second smell in order to complete the olfactory profile of Schioppettino. The wine completes its aromas with blueberry, blackberry, currant and cyclamen, as well as scents given by the aging in wood. Let's proceed now to Napa Valley Zinfandel, by holding the glass in vertical position and without swirling, let's evaluate its opening. The nose perceives intense and clean aromas of black cherry, plum and blackberry, as well as the pleasant scent of violet. After having swirled the glass, proceed with the second smell: the profile of Zinfandel is completed with blueberry and sensations of thyme and rosemary.

 Schioppettino and Zinfandel continue to highlight substantial differences also in their respective gustatory profiles. Let's proceed with the evaluation of our wines, starting, as in previous phases, from Colli Orientali del Friuli Schioppettino. Let's take a sip of this wine and evaluate the attack, that is, the initial gustatory sensations. In the mouth can be perceived a pleasant and evident acidity – dominant characteristic of Schioppetino – a medium body and a moderate astringency. We can perceive flavors of cherry, raspberry and plum, confirming the good correspondence to the nose. Let's now evaluate the attack of Napa Valley Zinfandel. The difference with Schioppettino is evident: in the Californian wine can perceived a more intense roundness and a decidedly modest acidity, the structure is clearly more robust and even the astringency is more intense. Also in this case correspondence to the nose is very good: in the mouth can perceived flavors of black cherry, plum and blackberry.

 Let's end our tasting by contrast with the evaluation of the final sensations the wines leave in the mouth after swallowing. The finish of Colli Orientali del Friuli Schioppettino is persistent, leaving in the mouth the characteristic sensation of crispness given by acidity. The flavors of cherry, raspberry and plum continue to be perceived, including a moderate sensation of astringency. The finish of Napa Valley Zinfandel is persistent, in which can be perceived flavors of black cherry, blackberry and plum, with a gustatory profile dominated by a pleasing sensation of roundness and good structure. Let's end the tasting by evaluating, once again, the profiles of the two wines, first taking a sip of Schioppettino and then a sip of Zinfandel. The differences are obvious and distant, in particular those related to acidity, roundness and astringency, as well as the differences related to red and black fruit.