Spring, for those involved in agriculture, and therefore in viticulture, is
that season which brings with it the renewed hope of rebirth, but also
the fear of nefarious events which could transform that rebirth into
an anticipated death. In some cases, moreover, these unfortunate events
directly cause the non-rebirth. Anyone involved in agriculture is always forced
to check, often with a certain apprehension, what happens both in heaven
and on earth, as good and bad news can come from both sides. The only
certainty is that – in the case of bad news – you will have to try to
remedy or prevent, as far as possible, by saving everything that can be saved.
It is not always possible to remedy, therefore, those who cultivate the land
are not always able to harvest the fruit of their work. Furthermore,
by considering those who work the land legitimately wish for the fruits
in the form of economic profits, the loss and regret are double.
April, the month that should express spring in its splendor of flowers and mild
temperatures, can sometimes – unfortunately – bring bad surprises and, when
Mother Nature bestows them this month, the consequences are serious and
worrying. Indeed, among the fearsome events of April there are sudden and
significant drops in temperature, hence the real risk of frosts. This
phenomenon, in fact, directly affects the young shoots of plants, which
– fragile and defenseless – are irreparably damaged, often causing their
death as well. Without buds, of course, there will be no flowers, without
flowers there will be no fruit. In some circumstances, and depending on the
moment in which the frost occurs, the plant stubbornly tries again to generate
new shoots, a condition that is always and in any case dependent on the course
of the meteorological conditions of spring. New shoots which, however, do not
have the productive strength of those lost because of the frost, but – as
they say – it is always better than nothing.
In recent days, the images from France, indeed, from French vineyards, have hit
the news and arising a particular interest. The news has been particularly made
spectacular by the aerial images that showed the controlled fires inside the
vineyards with the aim of contrasting the terrible effects of the April frost.
The expedient – certainly suggestive and that no vintner would like to see –
aims to create a layer of smoke above the vineyard in order to limit and
avoid the effects of the icy temperature. By looking at them, those images
coming from France, gave the impression that a huge area of vineyards were in
flames, in reality, they were simply trying to limit the damage by means of a
show that no vintner would like to attend. In general terms, this expedient is
effective in limiting possible future damage to fragile and young shoots
– trusting in Mother Nature's clemency – and it is completely ineffective for
those who, unfortunately, have already been damaged by the frost.
The spectacular aerial images of French vineyards almost made us ignore what,
no less worrying, has happened in Italy. In fact, April has also been very
severe with Italian vineyards and, more generally, with the entire agricultural
activities of the country. It is not my intention – of course – to diminish
the severity of the frosts that hit the vineyards of France, as French vintners
have suffered enormous damages because of the frosts, with an estimated
destruction of the vineyards between 50 and 80%. The first estimates, in fact,
amount to about two billion euros in damages and the French government, with
commendable promptness, has already allocated one billion euros to support
vintners and farmers. Also in Italy the frosts in April produced significant
damage and losses and, according to Confagricoltura (a national confederation
of farmers), the estimate currently amounts to one billion euros. The implicit
invitation is for the effective and immediate intervention of the competent
political authorities which will hopefully and promptly take appropriate
actions to support Italian farmers and vintners.
One would say it never rains but it pours. The critical condition of the
Italian wine trade – already severely hit by the economic consequences
produced by the Covid-19 pandemic – would be further aggravated by the risk of
losses in the 2021 season. The consequences of Brexit – the United
Kingdom's exit from the European Union – with the consequent procedures of
bureaucratic and administrative constraints, according to the Centro
Studi Divulga, have already caused a 36% decrease in wine exports. This is
not good news – in my opinion, not even for the citizens of the United
Kingdom, as their exports have dropped as well – as this country represents
one of the most important foreign markets for Italian wineries. The frosts in
April have therefore further contributed to the worsening of future market
opportunities for Italian wine, by also considering that – in certain areas –
it is estimated the loss of several thousand hectares of vineyards.
Not only vineyards, of course, as the loss and damage have affected the entire
agricultural sector with an estimate of damage to production ranging between 80
and 90%. In this regard – and by specifically considering the condition of
the vineyards in Italy – the damage caused by the frosts occurred in limited
areas, however extended throughout the Italian territory. In particular,
according to initial estimates, the vineyards that suffered the most damage are
those located in the mid-hill and valley floor areas, mainly destroying the
buds of the early ripening varieties. Among the regions to report the most
important damage are Umbria and Tuscany as well as some territories of
Emilia-Romagna and Veneto. The southern regions are among the least affected
ones. While hoping there will be no further consequences, and while waiting
for more in-depth checks, no significant decreases in wine production are
expected in Italy – according to the farmer and vintner associations –, with
the exception, unfortunately, of the most affected areas.
It is the repetition of the cycle of the seasons, always carrying with it
the unpredictability and, sometimes, the inevitable consequences of certain
negative events. In fact, Mother Nature is not always merciful and magnanimous
with those who live between heaven and earth. In some cases – let's not forget
this – it is man who conditions and alters the cycle and stability of natural
events, in others it is simply the course of Nature and for which, very
often, we are unarmed, suffering the extreme consequences without any
possibility of intervention. Nature gives, Nature takes away. This is something
known very well – and they find this out for themselves – by those who work
the land and from the land trust to harvest the fruits of their labor. This is
not, of course, a passive conclusion to the resignation of having to undergo
the whims of Mother Nature's fate, it simply is the evidence of a
possible risk. As always, we must wait for the end of the harvest and after
that – and only after that – we can breathe a liberating sigh of relief by
raising the glass and making a toast to the good luck and the good job done.
And also to Mother Nature.
Antonello Biancalana
|