In the collective imagination of enthusiasts, practically unanimously, wine
enjoys a decidedly solid and consolidated image. Any enthusiast or buyer,
thinking of wine and the way it presents itself before tasting, probably think of
it inside a glass bottle, with an enological style label, probably sealed
with a cork. Furthermore, they expect to have in the glass a drink containing a
certain quantity of alcohol, hoping it will be in balance with the rest of its
organoleptic qualities. The image changes according to the wine style: the bottle
normally used for sparkling wines is not clearly associated – or accepted – for
a red wine, whatever it is, saved the case of certain red sparkling wines.
Undoubtedly, a sparkling wine is never imagined inside a Bordeaux or Rhine bottle
and not only for technical reasons. In wine, very often, the way it is presented,
including its dress, undoubtedly anticipate its productive and sensorial
characteristics.
The image we normally have of wine is so strongly consolidated that the change of
some of its factors, even a very small one, is usually enough to raise the
indignation of many enthusiasts. It will be remembered, for example, the endless
debates that took place years ago when stoppers other than cork began to appear
in the world of wine. Crusades, anathemas and ideological wars were raised to the
cry vade retro synthetic stopper – or any other solution other than
cork – creating prejudices, even ferocious, against the unfortunate wine
contained in impure bottles sealed with the new evil caps. It took a few years
and, today, although there are still few cases of indignation, alternative
stoppers to cork are practically accepted by consumers. The idea alternative
stoppers to cork are suitable and, in many cases, better for keeping certain
wines, is by now a widely accepted fact in the imagination of consumers. Finding
a bottle with a synthetic or screw cap no longer arouses the indignation and
disappointment typical of past years.
Glass, on the other hand, in the imagination of wine enthusiasts seems to be an
indispensable and irreplaceable element. At least for now. Nevertheless, in these
recent times, due to the new productive and economic conditions, several
producers have reported the difficulty in finding glass bottles, so much so that
they thought about leaving the wine in barrels or tanks. To tell the truth, in
the world of wine, there are alternative solutions since many years now, such as
cardboard packages, both for the distribution of modest quantities like the
bottle, and for home supply such as to guarantee consumption for several days,
like glass carboys, for example. It is a solution usually intended for
ready-to-drink wines, with no claim – declared or supposed – to be kept for
years, as one would do with a glass bottle. The consumption of wines packaged in
cardboard containers, despite the mistrust of enthusiasts, represents an enormous
market share, both in economic and volume terms.
In recent times, moreover, there is another container which is getting a certain
interest – including the inevitable and disdainful suspicion – and which is
notoriously and mainly used in the soft drinks and beer markets: the aluminum
can. It should however be noted, this is not a recent novelty as long-term
Italian enthusiasts, so to speak, will probably remember the phenomenon of canned
wine adopted by a winery in the early 1980s and destined for the ready-to-drink
market. Despite the bureaucratic difficulties, that commercial idea however had a
moderate success that could make one think of a very different future for that
market. If it is true that in Italy the consumption of wine in cans is today a
decidedly marginal phenomenon, in other countries – like, for example, the United
States of America – it represents a not negligible market share. However, there
are many who are confident in the not so distant future, canned wine will become
common and not only for ready-to-drink wines.
Wine, apparently, is also experiencing a new revolution and this is
expressed in the phenomenon of dealcoholized wines, that is wines from which
alcohol has been partially or completely removed. I have already expressed my
opinion in the past about this type of drink and, even on this occasion, I
reiterate my non-interest, in the sense that, personally speaking, it is a
drink I would not buy, just like non-alcoholic beer. However, it should be noted
alcohol-free wine is gaining important market shares, a sign that – evidently –
there are consumers interested in this drink. This phenomenon seems to be growing
above all in the United States of America and in some European countries. In
Italy – apparently – dealcoholized wine does not enjoy the favor of consumers
who, despite the decrease in the consumption of alcoholic beverages in general,
when a wine is chosen, it is preferred the one with alcohol.
Many wine producers, including Italians, believe the production and marketing of
dealcoholized wine represents a new market and profit opportunity. They are
certainly right and the sales figures confirm it. According to what was issued by
The World Bank, the per capita consumption of pure alcohol – therefore of
alcoholic beverages in general – recorded a drop of 3.2% in Italy, 1.8% in
United Kingdom, 1.4% in France and the Netherlands, 1% in Germany. On the other
hand, the products benefiting of a significant increase are drinks considered
healthy, therefore with a lower quantity of sugars and alcohol, with a modest
intake of calories. In particular in the United States of America, where the
total profit of this type of drink has increased from 22 to 113 billion dollars.
In the last two years there has also been a 25% increase in wines with an
alcohol content of lower than 10% by volume, while alcohol-free ones have
increased by 65%. In accordance with the data issued by ISWR (International
Wines and Spirits Record) the sale of dealcoholized wines referred to ten
countries taken into examination (Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany,
Japan, South Africa, Spain, United Kingdom and United States of America) is
estimated with an average annual increase of 8%, while volumes are expected to
double by 2025.
As far as I'm concerned – and as I've always said, not only in these pages –
I'm perplexed by dealcoholized wine, not so much as a phenomenon, but above all
and in particular for purely sensorial and organoleptic reasons. Everyone is free
to consume and buy what they consider most healthy, coherent, right and
respectful to their ideas, manners and lifestyle choices. I do not object, for
example, to the need to prefer an alcohol-free drink for health, religious or
ideological reasons: freedom, also in this sense, must be guaranteed to everyone,
provided it does not harm the one of others. From an organoleptic point of view,
the removal of alcohol in wine unequivocally determines an important sensorial
imbalance. Wine is an acidic drink, without the contribution of round
substances capable of effectively contrasting this sensation, it becomes
undrinkable. Therefore, the lack of alcohol inevitably needs to be compensated
for with equivalent substances of a round nature in order to balance the
acidity and, in this sense, the enological magic is truly endless.
Then, at the end, everyone pours the wine – or non-wine – they prefer into
their own glasses. Indeed, even without using a glass at all, as it could become
completely useless.
Antonello Biancalana
|