Maybe it is because of the economic crisis of these times, or maybe for reasons
of chauvinism, in Italy is getting more and more common to strenuously defend
and support local production, inviting consumers to prefer local products while
avoiding foreign ones. The reasons used to convince consumers to prefer Italian
products are many. Including the supposed superiority of Italian products
over foreign ones, as if quality is a prerogative unique to Italy and in the
other countries are produced inferior things only. The funny thing is that,
according to the ones who suggest these behaviors, one should always prefer
Italian products, not only for a silly chauvinist and patriotic spirit, but also
because this is certainly and undoubtedly better. Who do Italian think they are
in order to be convinced they are the only ones in the world capable of
producing things of impeccable quality, in particular food?
We should maybe make these persons remember in Italy not all the shiny
things are made of gold and that in this country - just like any other country
of the world, after all - have been discovered huge food frauds. It has in fact
happened products of certified quality were made with low quality ingredients or
- even worse - used despite they were not suited for eating. Moreover, there are
cases of evident incongruity, products - and wines - which are ranked to
the highest legal quality and that, when tasted, they can barely be defined
as ordinary. However, according to the logic of some, these are products
to be bought and consumed for the simple reason they are made in Italy. We think
we must be clear about this: Italy is a country rich in food resources,
absolutely unique and of high quality, products having no equals in the world.
The same can be however and certainly be said for any other country: every place
- as well as every person - has something unique, incomparable and unrepeatable
to offer.
This does not however mean better, because quality needs other factors in
order to be expressed, last but not the least, honesty, culture and capacity of
the one who makes it. In case the advice, proposed with arrogance, as if it was
a sort of menace, must be followed in order to protect the economic
interests of corporations, the temptation to buy and consume other products is
very strong. Words are not enough to make quality, and it is not even enough the
silly chauvinist spirit: it takes facts and not speculations, in particular
economic and cultural ones. For what reason one should prefer a mediocre Italian
product when one can get a better product coming from another country, and even
sold at a more honest and accessible price? Only because it is Italian? We don't
believe this is enough. Quality has no frontiers and no flags. Let's begin to
reward the ones who behave in a serious and worthy way.
Consumers have a huge power over producers, something which can be clearly
expressed through purchase. In case a foreign product is better than the
analogous Italian one, for what reason one should reward the producer who shows
a lower capacity in offering quality? One should buy better products instead -
provided prices are reasonable and appropriate - in order to reward the ones who
truly deserve to be rewarded. The silly principle supporting the idea anything
produced in a determined country is indisputably better, reveals - as a matter
of fact - a huge cultural ignorance and an intellectual arrogance, supported by
the hypocrite presumption of the ones who believe to be better because he or
she does not know anything about what happens outside the borders of his or her
tiny territory. Anyone is free to set the borders of his or her world,
however no one can impose the same limits and his or her limited vision of the
world to others.
As every world is a world on its own, one should be sufficiently intelligent to
understand there is nothing absolute and everything and every world has
something to offer and from which one can learn from. Diversity is a great
richness from which one always learns something. As there is nothing absolute,
this is also true for quality. Everything has its own characteristics and
qualities, therefore saying what is the best one is, after all, a simple and
indisputable mater of opinion, taste and culture. As to make an example - one of
the most common ones - it makes no sense to say Champagne is better than
Franciacorta and vice versa. They are both excellent products: each one
expressing its own unique qualities which are also the result of unrepeatable
conditions exclusively found in their respective territories.
What offends the most is when one tries to justify the lack of quality with
matters of chauvinism and patriotism. Not only this offends the dignity and the
intelligence of consumers by using disputable sentimental matters, this also
offends producers who make real quality and for this reason they are not
rewarded. If we consider the specific case of Italy, they first suggest
consumers to prefer Italian products, therefore, when the message has been
spread, every region begins to strenuously suggest consumers to buy its
products, by saying they are better than the ones produced in other regions. The
system continues with provinces, corporations and cities, down to the smallest
part of territory: every one tries to make its own interests, every one tries to
fortifies its own borders while avoiding dangerous invasions from the outside.
Comparing and knowledge is a good way out for consumers who rightly try
and understand products coming from other countries and cultures. And, at the
end, they should reward the ones who are worth of trust by showing facts.
Quality has no frontiers. And it has no flags, too.
|